.png)
Most advice firms can point to CPD logs, annual observations, competence sign-off forms and a named supervisor. So on paper, they have a Training & Competency framework. But since we’re diving into what ‘good’ compliance looks like, let’s ask the uncomfortable question: is your T&C framework good, or just ‘good enough’?
Why is T&C under the spotlight again?
Consumer Duty hasn’t introduced a brand-new concept of competence, but it has raised expectations.
The FCA isn’t interested in whether advisers have completed the right number of CPD hours. It wants firms to evidence that:
In other words, T&C is a central part of how firms demonstrate good outcomes for clients.
T&C frameworks are stuck in the past
In our experience, most T&C weaknesses don’t come from negligence or bad intent.
The problems we see now come from frameworks that were designed for a different regulatory era and then left largely unchanged for years at a time.
Common signs include:
None of these feels catastrophic individually, but collectively they create risk and uncertainty.
So what does an effective, Consumer Duty–ready T&C framework look like in practice?
While no two firms are identical, strong frameworks tend to share the same core characteristics.
1. Clear, role-specific competence standards
Good T&C starts with clarity.
Advisers need to know:
This goes beyond generic job titles and recognises differences in advice types, client complexity and risk exposure.
2. Ongoing supervision (not annual sign-off!)
Competence isn’t something an adviser achieves once and keeps forever.
Effective frameworks:
This is especially important where firms are growing, onboarding new advisers or expanding services.
3. CPD that develops capability
Under Consumer Duty, CPD needs to be more than attendance records.
Strong T&C frameworks ensure training is:
The focus shifts from ticking boxes to asking “Did it make a difference?”
4. Competent supervisors with real oversight
One of the most overlooked areas of T&C is supervisor competence.
Good frameworks make it clear:
Without this, even well-designed T&C structures struggle in practice.
5. Evidence that stands up to scrutiny
Good T&C is defensible.
If the FCA asked you to demonstrate adviser competence tomorrow, would you be able to:
If the answer isn’t an emphatic “yes,” that’s a warning sign.
Ask yourself honestly:
If any of those questions cause hesitation, you’re not alone, but positive compliance is on the horizon.
How does compliance support makes the difference with T&C?
Many firms assume T&C shortcomings are internal failing, but we find they’re often a reflection of the support model behind the scenes.
Generic compliance support can struggle to:
Modern compliance support helps firms stay on the right side of the regulator, and gives them confidence in how their people are developed and supervised.
Final thought
A strong Training & Competency framework can instil the confidence to say:
“We know our advisers are competent, we know how we evidence it, and we know it supports good outcomes for clients.”
Does your current framework get you there? If not, taking a fresh look is a sensible next step, and a second opinion could make all the difference.
Our expert team is always on hand to discuss all aspects of compliance, including T&C – and we love to chat, so get in touch today to get started.

Paul is a compliance and Training & Competency expert, with almost 30 years experience in the financial services sector as both adviser and senior manager.